Sunday, February 7, 2010

Why tort reform makes people nervous

Conservatives have assailed Democrats for not including some sort of tort reform in the health care reform bill.

Some health care experts are convinced that frivolous lawsuits and outrageous jury awards are forcing doctors out of business, or causing them to practice expensive "defensive" medicine.

(Most experts say this is a tiny fraction of the healthcare cost problem.)

I'm comfortable with the idea of tort reform, but before we go too far down that road we need to make sure that far more information is available to consumers about their doctors, their local hospitals and nursing homes.

This case in Texas illustrates the level of secrecy that often surrounds physicians, medical boards, and patient complaints.

When nurse Anne Mitchell filed an anonymous complaint with the state medical board against a local doctor, he actually went to the police.

She now faces criminal charges.

As the New York Times reported:
The prosecutor said he would show that Mrs. Mitchell had a history of making “inflammatory” statements about Dr. Rolando G. Arafiles Jr. and intended to damage his reputation when she reported him last April to the Texas Medical Board, which licenses and disciplines doctors.

Mrs. Mitchell counters that as an administrative nurse, she had a professional obligation to protect patients from what she saw as a pattern of improper prescribing and surgical procedures — including a failed skin graft that Dr. Arafiles performed in the emergency room, without surgical privileges.

He also sutured a rubber tip to a patient’s crushed finger for protection, an unconventional remedy that was later flagged as inappropriate by the Texas Department of State Health Services.
Lawsuits may, in fact, be an inappropriate and costly way to hold doctors accountable when they make mistakes or act unprofessionally.

But in many states, it remains nearly impossible to find out if your doctor has faced complaints or sanctions for medical errors.

Do a Google search for medical errors and you'll find that it's hardly a marginal concern.

This from the US Department of Health and Human Services:
"Medical errors are one of the Nation's leading causes of death and injury. A recent report by the Institute of Medicine estimates that as many as 44,000 to 98,000 people die in U.S. hospitals each year as the result of medical errors. This means that more people die from medical errors than from motor vehicle accidents, breast cancer, or AIDS."

Common sense tort reform is a good idea.

But with it should come clear and unambiguous sunshine laws that give consumers all the information they need about the safety records of their doctors.

15 Comments:

At February 7, 2010 12:45 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Common sense is the answer. I pulled a muscle in my back 2 years ago. Went to our local hospital where the staff treated me for a possible heart attack. There was no reason to do so other than to cover themselves. I don't blame them for doing so, but common sense tells me if a stone cold sober guy they know comes in and says he hurt his back, he hurt his back. The treatment racked another $300.+ to the bill that my insurance covered, but that's $300.00 plus that could have been used for something real.

How we go about establishing "common sense" is the hard part.

 
At February 7, 2010 1:17 PM , Blogger Jim said...

I wonder if Anonymous is over 50. Heart attacks are often disguised as aches and pains that that don't feel like heart attacks to the patient. Consequently if you are in late middle age or older and go to the ER with pain most anywhere between your hips and you neck they check for a heart attack. Since heart attacks are a leading cause of death in the US it is a sensible if somewhat annoying precaution.

As for tort reform, I agree that there should be more transparency to the medical profession. OTOH the estimates I've seen for what tort reform would save run from .5% to 1%, not enough to excuse to holding up the the entire health insurance reform process over.

 
At February 7, 2010 2:33 PM , Anonymous JDM said...

Common sense says that trying to make millions off of a $300 mishap is a major part of the health care problem.

I love it when "most experts" are called in to defend a position. What?? Most [liberal] experts??

Here's an expert that everyone loves to point to for Obamacare. The CBO.

"As Congress wrangles over the skyrocketing cost of health care reform, the Congressional Budget Office has determined that reforming the medical malpractice insurance system, a.k.a. "med-mal reform" or tort reform, could save $54 billion over 10 years."

Let's see. That's about 5.4% of 1 trillion total savings Obamacare is claiming. It's not the whole enchilada, but it's not nothing.

 
At February 7, 2010 2:48 PM , Blogger Brian Mann said...

JDM -

I think you're right. It's not nothing.

But tort reform does need to come with balancing reform to consumer information laws.

See my original post.

The number of outrageous cases -- and there are some -- where people win crazy amounts of money over trivial infractions does need to be addressed.

But it's dwarfed by the number of people killed every year by medical mistakes.

--Brian, NCPR

 
At February 7, 2010 3:22 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The woman is not even a real nurse, she is an admin nurse, those who type and checks medicare eligibility.

The rubber suture was a temporary fix. THe doctor is US licensed, had previously practiced in other US hospitals, FOR YEARS.

People are calling him now a quack because of the ramblings of a typist nurse who writes ghost letters so someone who worked all his life be deduced to a 'quack'.

She wants someone to lose his license, something the guy worked for all his life. Now that she was outed, she is now playing hero - claiming she just wants to save the world.

How can you be a hero if you are out to destroy someone's reputation and livelihood?

The guy has saved lots of lives, hasnt lost one. Yet the woman is out to destroy him. Now is that heroism to you?

 
At February 7, 2010 3:38 PM , Blogger Elaine said...

Gollydarn, people. The post says, yes to tort reform and yes to better information for patients. This strikes me as the very common sense that JDM and Anon 12:45 are wishing for. Geewhiz, enough already.

 
At February 7, 2010 5:34 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

A hero is a sandwich...

 
At February 7, 2010 10:43 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The fact is that health-care/health insurance, along with many other facets of modern life, is too complicated and requires too much specialized knowledge to be understood by a layman. We have a healthcare system that purports to be a free enterprise system but in fact it is not and cannot be. A free market depends on the players in the market having enough information to make a rational decision on how to spend their money and having real choice in the market. Therefore we do not have a free and fair market. Time for single-payer universal healthcare.

 
At February 8, 2010 10:01 AM , Blogger Brian said...

Right now, insurance companies have virtual impunity to jerk around (decorum prevents me from using a stronger word) patients. The concern I have is that right now, the civil courts are the only recourse patients have to force insurance companies to honor their commitments. Even as it is, insurance companies are trying to limit access to the civil courts. My fear is that "tort reform" will limit that entirely.

 
At February 8, 2010 11:33 AM , Anonymous JDM said...

Brian:

Are you sure you're not hearing from fringe suggestions that cause your worries?

Here is the first item that came up on Google for "tort reform health care proposal"

This seems reasonable, and will not cause the limit to access that you say you fear.


the College of Surgeons said in a Sept. 22 letter to Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), chairman of the panel.

Those provisions included:

* reasonable limits on non-economic damages, such as those limitations included in laws in California and Texas

* alternatives to civil litigation, such as health courts and early disclosure and compensation offers

* protections for physicians who follow established evidence-based practice guidelines

* protections for physicians volunteering their services in a disaster or in local or national emergencies.

 
At February 8, 2010 11:53 AM , Anonymous Paul said...

This is a good example of why we can't make any progress in reforming health care. Brian, these issues of access to information on doctors has nothing to do with tort reform. Why can't you set the cap for damages at 500K and still work on changing the system to give patients more access to info on doctors? In the case of negligence you will always have a legal avenue outside the cap.

 
At February 8, 2010 11:54 AM , Blogger Brian Mann said...

These look like good ideas. Is there any reason not to pair them with better consumer information about doctors, hospitals and nursing homes?

--Brian, NCPR

 
At February 8, 2010 12:21 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

@12:45PM: I would submit that the staff addressed your concerns appropriately. My wife (ER Physician) recently saw a patient who came in complaining of some back pain after lifting weights in the gym. He ended up having a ruptured aorta and required major emergency surgery. Doctors cannot trust what patients say.

 
At February 8, 2010 12:38 PM , Anonymous Paul said...

Brian,

Sure we need both. But let's do what we can now. The info one may take a little time. It seems like right now we are making little progress because we keep linking things together. The more stuff you link together the more chance that you will end up with something that somebody doesn't agree on. That is what happened with the most recent HC bills. Let's learn from the mistakes and move on.

 
At February 8, 2010 3:08 PM , Blogger Brian said...

"It seems like right now we are making little progress because we keep linking things together."

It's because serious attempts at health care reform only comes up about every 15-20 years. People believe that if it's not done now, it won't be possible for another generation. That's why people want to do as much as possible in this attempt.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home