China's dirty secret
We've been talking a lot here on the In Box recently about environmental policy, the pros, the cons, the economic costs.
A new study released today suggests that China is literally burying itself under the toxic waste of its mega-industrial revolution.
The study, reported in the New York Times, was conducted by China's government, and suggests that the world's most populous country will eventually have to rethink it's economic policies fundamentally.
“We believed we needed to cut our emissions in half, but today’s data means a lot more work needs to be done,” Mr. Ma Jun [director of the Institute of Public and Environmental affairs ]said.
One interesting aspect of this study is the amount of agricultural and farm pollution identified as most problematic.
The extent of agricultural waste could prove a more intractable problem than the many factories dumping effluent into China’s rivers and lakes.
“When it’s millions of farmers, it’s more difficult to bring it under control,” Mr. Ma said.
Steven Ma, of the Beijing office of Greenpeace, said that the government’s decision to calculate and release figures for agriculture would start to have an effect on the policy debate over water pollution in China. “Everybody knew there was a problem with agricultural pollution in China, but now there are numbers,” he said.


10 Comments:
Not to worry. Cap and trade will fix it all. Really, Obummer said so...
Bret is actually correct. Legislation like cap and tax will help to transform this country into becoming a better leader in environmental protection, thus becoming a better example for countries like China. If anything is going to be done about global warming, it has to start with us.
Legislation like cap and tax will help to transform this country into a 3rd world nation!
My guess: China's heading to a future - thanks to pollution - in which it will either collapse on itself (mass poisonings, birth defects, breakdown of agricultural production due to pollution), or it will feel obligated to invade other regions in order to replace what it has ruined.
All thanks to greed and short-sightedness.
Scary.
We know what that future looks like, don't we?
fyi, Cap and trade originated as a Republican idea.
And it has helped bring Adirondack lakes back to life by limiting acid rain.
The original cap and trade was a clean air idea. This is wealth redistribution on a world wide scale that will do nothing to alter CO2 emissions.
You damn all cap and trade as a bad thing, and it distorts the dialogue. You have a problem with regulating carbon emissions. You should be more clear about that.
I have a problem with the idea of the costs that go with cap and trade, with the limitations, with the administration and with the idea that some how it will "fix" anything. From what I see all it will do is place further costs on the US and other developed countries while allowing places like China and India to pollute freely all while the administrators make zillions.
It will hurt us, it will cripple us even more.
Thank you. But it has nothing to do with cap and trade, per se. Cap and trade within China, for acid rain, would probably work if enforced.
You have an issue on the current administration plan to cap and trade carbon emissions. Just be more clear about it.
Post a Comment
<< Home