Tuesday, November 3, 2009

One voter's experience

I voted this morning in St. Lawrence County. From the story I heard on NCPR, including a re-broadcast of Jonathan Brown's visit to the Board of Elections last spring to explore the new electronic voting machines, I had the impression that I would have an opportunity to examine my ballot once I inserted it into the actual voting machine and before I hit the "cast ballot" button. In other words, a chance to check to make sure I had voted for those I intended to vote for...remember the Florida debacle...

It's not that straightforward at my polling place. I received instructions on how to complete the ballot and was told someone would show me how to use the actual machine once I filled out the ballot at a "privacy" station. From what I had heard about the machines, I assumed that when I inserted the ballot there would a digital read out of my selections that I could check over before officially casting my ballot.

Not so. Unless you actually request such a check of your vote, it does not happen automatically. Again, at my polling place, no one mentioned anything about the option to check my vote or how it works. And, what you get if you do request a vote check is not a digital read out but a printed piece of paper.

This would all be fine with these adjustments to the process used at the polling place:
1) Poll workers should be officially instructed to explain the "vote check" process--without being asked by individual voters.
2) Ideally, machines should be re-tooled to provide the voter with a digital read out rather than a paper review of their ballot before it is cast. (There's a built-in paper trail through the paper ballot fed into the electronic voting machine.)
2) Poll workers should, in general, be very proactive about offering assistance as we implement the new technology.

Finally, perhaps because the machines are new to my district, there was a poll worker who stood near the digital voting machine ready to assist voters with the insertion of their ballots into the machine. The machine sits in a totally open space, no privacy. So, when you go to insert your ballot and ask for help, because your vote is marked in bold permanent marker (at least this was the marking tool used at my polling place), your voting choices are visible to anyone within a few feet of the machine as you insert your ballot.

Not huge complaints but as we implement new technology, we should try to get it as user-friendly as possible.

Bottom line: I didn't have to worry about bombs exploding outside the polling booth or anything else designed to de-rail the single most important privilege afforded citizens in a democracy. If you're reading this and haven't voted today--and don't intend to--please re-think that. Voting matters--but only if we all exercise the privilege.

Ellen Rocco

Labels:

9 Comments:

At November 3, 2009 11:45 AM , Anonymous Bret4207 said...

I also found it a little disconcerting not to know if my vote went in correctly. Of course in my town the voting assistants are very nice, public spirited seniors so I certainly wasn't about to give anyone a hard time. But it sure would be nice to know for a fact my vote went in like I marked it.

The lack of privacy didn't bother as I don;t care who knows how I voted. Of course when "card check" passes Union people will be the victims there.

Lesson learned? Bring my glasses next time!

 
At November 3, 2009 12:23 PM , Anonymous Rich Loeber said...

At my polling place in Saranac Lake, the verification option was not made clear to me either. Also, the "privacy booths" were anything BUT private. They were just flimsy cardboard dividers set on top of a folding table. Anyone could walk by behind me or sit next to me and see how I was voting. Thumbs down on that part of the experience.

 
At November 3, 2009 12:36 PM , Anonymous Ellen Rocco said...

As you can see, Bret, some people care deeply about the constitutional guarantee to privacy re: voting choices. And I think it's an important guarantee. While you and I may not much care who knows how we vote, many people do care.

Most importantly, a lack of privacy can be a deterrent for some people--to either voting at all or voting the way they'd really like to. I'm thinking here, for example, of my old neighbor who once told me that when she was a young voter she kept strictly secret the fact that she voted for the party not supported by her parents and others in her family...who had been life-long, generations-long supporters of their preferred party. She never told anyone how she voted for fear of being ostracized. Others I've known through the years have feared for their livelihoods if their employers knew their voting preferences. And so on...I think the constitution got it right on this one.

Happy voting...
Ellen

 
At November 3, 2009 2:30 PM , Anonymous jill v said...

Ellen, you've hit the nail on the head. For people without power or confidence, to vote is something they would never dare do in public- not because of shame at their choice, but becasue of mental health issues, coercion, revenge that might be visited on them, domestic violence issues. It is wonderful to be have a voice, and the confidence to use it- but secret ballots are powerful for those who lack their own power, or who question their safety if they express their voice. Articulateness is a product of many things- be thankful if we have them.

 
At November 3, 2009 2:35 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

My experience - I voted in the Town of Franklin, just outside of Saranac Lake and the poll workers were as they always are: pleasant and helpful. I haven't been paying enough attention to this aspect of the election (you'll probably think I've been on Mars to have missed this) but I didn't realize that we were going to have new voting machines until I walked into the town hall. I was shown how to fill out the ballot and was told of the two propositions... on the BACK of the page. By the time I was done voting on the front and glanced back over to check it (like I could have changed anything after marking in permanent marker although when I mentioned that they said there was a process for discarding the one ballot and giving me another one) I gave it to a worker who said I could do it myself (privacy) or they could help me. She waited with me until the digital readout indicated it was recorded. So, they certainly new the process and were helpful to me in going through it. But, I didn't get to the back of the ballot - my own fault I guess for not remembering to turn it over but I see this as a a serious problem for getting people to vote on the propositions. I'm very frustrated that I didn't vote on those two propositions.

The privacy... or total lack thereof: I'm like Bret4207 and Ellen in that I don't care that anyone knows how I voted as I've never been particularly bashful about my political leanings. But I agree with Rich and Ellen and I feel this is a huge problem. The secret ballot is a basic right in this country and I feel this absolutely needs to see a better resolution. It almost seems like it was an afterthought the way it was set up.

Mark, Saranac Lake

 
At November 3, 2009 2:43 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is refreshing to see that most people seem to agree on the importance on a secret ballot. In fact, even referring to it as "basic right". That is very refreshing.

Thank you.
Macomb

 
At November 3, 2009 3:27 PM , Blogger Susan Olsen said...

Anonymous from Macomb - Yes! The secret ballot IS a basic right - more: I would call it sacrosanct. If Democracy-Capital-D can be thought of in religious terms, then the citizens' vote is its highest, holiest sacrament. As Ellen and others have noted, not all citizens feel they can express their voting choices publicly, for so many reasons. The voters' privacy must NEVER be violated.

That is why, above all other concerns, the obvious lack of privacy at my polling place this morning disturbed me. As I wrote earlier, it was not an issue for ME, in my particular location - Saranac Lake - all those present evinced respect for others. Unfortunately, such is not always the case in our all-too-human world.

 
At November 3, 2009 6:55 PM , Anonymous Bret4207 said...

No argument Ellen. That part needs improving.

All of you who are concerned about the secret ballot should be keeping watch on the "card check" issue that'll be upcoming. No more secret ballots for Union people in certain sized businesses BY LAW. Not a good thing.

 
At November 5, 2009 6:57 AM , Blogger chuttel said...

I am still waiting for write-in votes to be reported/counted for the 23rd. I know for a fact that there were write-in votes cast in the 23rd race but no mention of them yet. Were these votes counted?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home