Sunday, October 25, 2009

Doug Hoffman, a true third party candidate

From the opening days of the NY-23 race, Lake Placid accountant Doug Hoffman has argued that he is the true Republican in this race.

"Forget the Republican party bosses," he advised. "I believe the voters in the Republican Party are looking for a candidate like me."

The media -- including myself -- generally accepted the notion that his candidacy reflected a deep divide within the Republican movement.

But the two independent polls conducted so far contradict (or at least temper) this portrait of the race.

In fact, Hoffman is winning only a little more than a quarter of Republicans -- 27%.

That's a whopping twenty points behind Republican nominee Dede Scozzafava, a landslide of difference.

Hoffman is only faring 9 points better among Republicans than Democrat Bill Owens, who's attracting 19% of the GOP vote.

What's more, as the race has continued, Hoffman's share of the GOP vote hasn't grown much, if at all, when compared to the earlier Siena Research Institute survey.

Hoffman's strength, such as it is, comes among independent voters. He's splitting that part of the electorate pretty much evenly with Owens (35% for Hoffman, 32% for Owens).

As Newt Gingrich has pointed out, Scozzafava was nominated after a thorough and fairly open candidate search (one which Hoffman initially praised) conducted by local North Country residents.

"There were four local nominating meetings," Gingrich said. "All four picked [Scozzafava]. None placed the conservative candidate in the top three – not a one."

Since the Republican-Conservative battle erupted, some GOP committee chairs have grumbled about Scozzafava's selection.

But in theory, they settled on the candidate who they deemed the best match for the district and its brand of Republicanism. (As Gingrich observed, this isn't rural Georgia.)

In an essay published today in the New York Post -- not, note, in a local North Country newspaper --Hofman wrote, "I didn't leave the Republican Party, the party left me."

To be sure, Scozzafava is a liberal Republican.

But the truth is that the North Country GOP has long stood well to the left of the national conservative movement.

John McHugh, who recently stepped aside as congressman after decades of service, was a Republican moderate who battled frequently with the national GOP leadership.

McHugh was pro-choice, an environmental activist who voted for President Obama's economic stimulus and joined the Democratic administration as Army Secretary.

The three Republicans who represent the North Country in the state Assembly all share Scozzafava's position supporting same-sex marriage. (To be fair, the region's state Senators do not.)

My point?

Hoffman has run an astonishing campaign, attracting broad support from ultra-conservative groups across the country.

He has embraced (and been embraced by) the new "virtual" conservative movement, a loose amalgamation of talk show hosts, tea party organizers, media outlets, and single-issue activists.

He has also demonstrated significant appeal among right-of-center voters in the district who have rejected (or at least distanced themselves) from the two major parties.

As such, he is best understood as a true third-party Conservative candidate, with only limited appeal (so far) among the district's Republican voters.

That's a perfectly respectable thing to be. Third party candidates play important roles, representing people disaffected with the major parties and their agendas.

More and more, Doug Hoffman's candidacy resembles that of Ross Perot, whose decision to run for president in 1992 reshaped American politics for a decade.

The question remaining, of course, is whether this path can actually lead Doug Hoffman to an upset victory over both the Republican and the Democrat.

We'll know the answer in less than ten days.

Labels:

6 Comments:

At October 25, 2009 11:09 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I hope Hoffman participates in the debate in Plattsburgh so I can get more specifics about his position on issues. I have always voted Republican in National elections and I am still undecided. Up to this point all I have really heard from him are far right wing talking points of anti-tax, anti-government, anti-gay, anti-Acorn. So far I all I can tell is that he optimizes the label "party of no". I am sure there is more to the man, but I haven't seen it. I was VERY disappointed he canceled with the Clifton Fine Econ. Dev. Corp. I am not happy with the direction of our country, but I know that the Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Glen Beck direction is NOT the direction I want my county to go. Now, after reading the Watertown Daily Times Editorial board's reaction to their interview with him, and his lack if knowledge - or even interest - in 23rd issues, Dede is looking better every day. Especially since he got upset he didn't have the questions ahead of time. Doug, we want to know what YOU think, not your workers/researchers, about the issues important to us.

 
At October 25, 2009 12:21 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think I would pass on the "third party" concept. Sarah Palin is backing an American candidate.
Republicans are the same as Democrats these days nether party is interested in representing the
American people. It is also becoming evident that both parties no longer believe in the free
market. We just finished eight years with an administration that promoted open borders and
globalism and now we have put a socialist in the White House. Would anyone care to take a guess where this is all heading?

Campbell,
Colorado

 
At October 25, 2009 12:59 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

>I know that the Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Glen Beck direction is NOT the direction I want my county to go.

i think, globalization, is the way to go, to put it like that, america has to lead, or like that, this world need a principled american leadership.

do you just want to get favor from the world without contributing an single idea to it?



btw, i am chinese.

 
At October 25, 2009 4:14 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

A global tyrannical government? No thanks, I'll pass on the communism. Anyway were having enough problems with this socialist right now.

Campbell,
Colorado

 
At October 25, 2009 7:12 PM , Blogger mames said...

McHugh voted against the stimulus--it received zero GOP votes in the House.

Reagan said agreeing 80 percent of the time was what was important as a party. He also said not to criticize fellow Republicans. I think he'd be very upset with the way the ultra-right of the GOP is undermining the party as a whole. As a North Country native, I want to know what exactly Dick Armey, the Club for Growth, and Michele Bachmann understand about the 23rd District. The lunatic fringe has no tolerance for individual interpretations or nuances on anything. The GOP will go the way of the Whigs.

As a Democrat, I'm loving it.

 
At October 26, 2009 9:29 AM , Anonymous Bret4207 said...

The "right side" parties- the Republicans, Conservatives, Constitutionalists, etc, are in a mess right know. Part of the wants to go for a centrist position, some are Globalists, others actually think the Constitution means something (what a crazy idea THAT is!). Until it all hashes itself out things will remain in the mess they are. I'm sure the libs love it. I'm also sure there are a lot of previously unconcerned people that are slowly waking up tot he fact we can't keep spending, can't keep taxing and that we're in deep, deep trouble.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home