Friday, July 17, 2009

Renting the right-wing industrial complex

I've written before about what I call the right-wing industrial complex.

That is, the network of lucrative business deals -- speaking tours, books, radio shows, think-tank berths, etc. -- available to conservatives who toe the Right's line.

My concern is that the strict requirements for dogmatic (and even ultra) conservative positions skews the Republican Party's political approach.

What satisfies the RWIC doesn't necessarily resonate with voters...

The lure of big $$$s also gives prominent politicians such as Sarah Palin a disincentive to stick with the thorny, complex and less-well compensated business of rebuilding the GOP.

Now Politico has broken a story that takes this trend one giant step further.

The on-line political journal has uncovered evidence of a conservative group literally trying to sell its political influence to the highest bidder.
The American Conservative Union asked FedEx for a check for $2 million to $3 million in return for the group’s endorsement in a bitter legislative dispute, then flipped and sided with UPS after FedEx refused to pay.
The ACU describes itself as the nation's oldest lobbying group devoted to conservative principles.
But the term "lobbying" here may be a bit misleading.

ACU isn't your typical K-Street corporate shop.

It is one of the leading right-of-center idea and agenda generators in Washington. Its board includes movement luminaries such as Grover Norquist and the organization hosts the influential CPAC conference.

Here again from Politico:
The conservative group’s remarkable demand — black-and-white proof of the longtime Washington practice known as “pay for play” — was contained in a private letter to FedEx that was provided to POLITICO.

6 Comments:

At July 17, 2009 10:28 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

If they changed sides in this dispute, are they still the RWIC?

 
At July 17, 2009 10:29 AM , Blogger Brian Mann said...

They are if their decision to change sides was influenced by $$ and not political principle.

-Brian, Westport

 
At July 17, 2009 2:34 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with the person who said that congressmen should wear NASCAR suits so that we can see who their corporate sponsors are.

Mike, Lyons Falls

 
At July 20, 2009 8:25 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sounds like a good old-fashioned lobbyist. Sell influence and political pressure. Entrepreneurial.

 
At July 20, 2009 6:38 PM , Blogger markd107 said...

"Sounds like good old-fashioned lobbyist. Sell influence and political pressure. Entrepreneurial." Except that this is not how our system of government is suppose to work. It is not suppose to be for sale to the highest bidder. And when FedEx rejected the extortionist tactic the ACU put all their lobbying weight behind UPS. These groups have no principles, they are only interested in the all-mighty dollar. For those without the financial means the US government is unavailable. These groups give capitalism a bad name. They are only interested in human riches, not human rights. This country will soon be another failure and the greedy capitalists will be the culprits.

 
At July 21, 2009 1:52 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

A successful communist state must first go through the phase of failed capitalism.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home