First take on Sotomayor: Brilliant politics
President Barack Obama will articulate strong reasons today for naming Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Conservatives will rally to push back hard. Here's a first salvo, in the New York Times:
“Judge Sotomayor is a liberal judicial activist of the first order who thinks her own personal political agenda is more important than the law as written,” said Wendy E. Long, counsel to the Judicial Confirmation Network. “She thinks that judges should dictate policy, and that one’s sex, race, and ethnicity ought to affect the decisions one renders from the bench.”What's certain is that Mr. Obama has used the power of his office to regain control of the discussion, shifting away from national security and terrorism questions toward the Supreme Court.
Also, he's placed Republicans in a dangerous spot:
Do they fight tooth-and-nail against a nominee that they oppose ideologically, even if it means further infuriating Hispanics?
Or do they concede the ground to the first Hispanic Justice in U.S. history, thereby enraging their conservative-traditionalist base?
One final thought:
Sotomayor's nomination will further clarify the political trajectory of the Hispanic community, which is increasingly Democratic but also conservative on social issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage.
Do Hispanic leaders whole-heartedly embrace this judge, despite her left-of-center positions?
Or do they push for someone more in line with the community's core Roman Catholic identity?


9 Comments:
I'm just glad I'm not Republican...
No one should question President Obama's ability as a "politician".
Do you believe that Ms. Sotomayor is a good nominee?
Even before the slot opened, numerous reports indicated that his choice would be a minority female. I can't help but feel a bit sorry as the media makes it sound like picking the last kids for a kick ball game in the school yard.
I don't know enough about Sotomayor yet to have even a private opinion about her qualifications.
She's clearly left-of-center; but she's certainly no more to the left than John Roberts and Samuel Alito were to the right.
I wouldn't feel sorry for her, by the way.
Progressives are generally very comfortable with the idea that breaking down barriers (first Hispanic, single mom, etc.) is a reasonable part of decisions like this.
My guess is that Sotomayor is delighted to be "a first," assuming she's confirmed...
-Brian
To be clear, she's not a single mom. She was raised by a single mom. Not sure which you meant Brian, but there's incorrect info flying around.
Also, seems pretty centrist, and qualified:"
After law school, Sotomayor spent five years as Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan, trying dozens of criminal cases. Robert Morgenthau, who chose her for the position, described her as a "fearless and effective prosecutor." She entered private practice in 1984, working as an international corporate litigator handling cases involving everything from intellectual property to banking, real estate and contract law." http://globalgrind.com/source/www.huffingtonpost.com/670117/10-things-we-need-to-know-about-sonia-sotomayor/
Left of the Roberts court? Like the majority of Americans, yes.
Left of center? Don't think you can conclude that yet.
Thanks for the correction; I had heard incorrect info about her being a single mom.
Brian
I believe she's divorced. That is bound to get conservative panties in a wad, no?
Yes, just like the conservatives went after divorcees Newt Gingrich and Ronald Reagan.
In the end, the Republicans won't oppose her nomination. They will concede to pander to the Hispanic vote.
I hope that they don't act in the repulsive manner which Sen. Schumer did during the Roberts and Alito confirmation hearings.
Right. We'd hate to see anyone in the GOP go after her for being empathetic to Latinos the way Schumer lit into Alito for being soft on La Cosa Nostra after Alito said this:
"When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender. And I do take that into account."
That totally sucked when Schumer did that.
Post a Comment
<< Home