Arts and Crafts
A recent comment to this blog raised a big question - one on which I have often pondered, and which I had previously avoided addressing . . .
In response to my son's definition of an "artist" vs. an "artisan", a reader wrote:
Interesting - in my mind, an "artist" is someone who is skillful in creating fine art. An artisan is someone who is skillful in creating fine crafts. Funny how we can all have different definitions of things!
The reader's definition of "artist" vs. "artisan" is as fair as any - but it raises a deeper question. What, then, is "fine art", and what is "fine craft"?
Now, I have previously avoided addressing this question in this forum because I know it can arouse deep passions. Please, if you choose to read further, recognize that, like Socrates, I know nothing: I am only raising questions.
Implicit to this whole question is a value judgement. Historically, "art" has been considered superior to "craft". Some people who create splendid things feel hurt when their work is referred to as "craft" and not "art" - they feel this places their accomplishments on a lower plane.
We may not intend such a judgment - I am sure the writer of the above comment didn't mean to disparage anyone - but it is there nonetheless. It is a connotation inherent to the English language.
My dictionary, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate, 11th Ed., defines art like this: "the conscious use of skill and creative imagination, esp. in the production of aesthetic objects". (emphasis mine)
Okay....
Now, "craft" is defined thus: "an occupation or trade requiring manual dexterity or artistic skill". (again, my emphasis)
So, based on those two definitions, we have some apparent overlap: art involves creating aesthetic objects; craft involves artistic skill.
Further, I looked for a definition of "fine art", and found this: "art concerned primarily with the creation of beautiful objects".
That's certainly vague.
Years ago, in debating this whole question with another artist friend of mine, she said she had heard that "art" is purely decorative, while "craft" is anything which can be used for a practical purpose.
Hmmm.
Does that definition make sense? Consider:
Donna Foley works in fiber. She raises her own sheep, then shears them, cleans & cards their wool, dyes it and spins it. She then weaves incredible pieces - some, purely decorative: tapestries and hangings designed to adorn a wall. But some of her work is functional, too: rugs to both beautify and warm a floor, scarves to look chic while warding off chills, placemats to enhance a table - and keep crumbs off it.
Is she an artist, or an artisan - or a crafts person?
She is also a member of the Adirondack Artists' Guild - does that perforce make her an artist?
Another Guild member, of whose work I wrote in my previous post, is Mary Lou Reid. As a potter, she makes all manner of useful things: mugs, bowls, plates, candleholders, and so forth. She also creates purely decorative objects - wall hangings, mobiles, and the like.
Is she an artist? Apparently, the Guild members think so. I do, too.
Here's another consideration.
What about meaning, message?
I have previously blogged about why people create art - often it is for the purpose of expressing a truth, an opinion, a belief.
Is that intention necessary, for a work to be called art? If so, then I am certainly no artist, for most of my work is created for pleasure - my own, and the viewers'.
But at the same time, cannot meaning be inferred, even when it is not explicit? And, is not a celebration of pure beauty, or of evident life, or of that which we love, a valid meaning?
Hmmm, again.
Okay, so how about a kid who braids a lanyard out of plastic strips at summer camp - surely that is craft - not art?
Wait a minute.
This also hooks us on the thorn of intention. If the kid is using the only material available, and is investing skill into doing the best job he or she is able to do, and intends the finished piece as an expression of love given to a parent, say, or a counsellor - would that not be art?
What do YOU think?
My immediate response to the comment which got this ball rolling was this:
I wouldn't necessarily disagree with you - I'm not sure my son's definition is "correct". However, your definition then raises the question: what is art, and what is craft?I have heard many answers to this in the past - but I'm not sure I buy any of them. As far as I can see, the line between art & craft is thin and fuzzy, or maybe non-existant...Readers? Any thoughts?
And I will reiterate: it seems to me, these distinctions are tenuous at best.
And I will further reiterate: Readers? Thoughts?
Labels: Adirondack Artists' Guild, Donna Foley, Mary Lou Reid
Susan Olsen grew up in Saranac Lake, and has watched with delight its transformation into a flourishing arts community. Her committment to the arts deepened while her husband was deployed to Iraq in 2003-2004, and she now owns and operates 
3 Comments:
This is certainly an interesting discussion. I respect people's passions although personally I have no patience with "snobbery," nor with work created for "shock" alone. As a lit major in college, I absorbed the philosophy that good literature conveys universal values. Whether the label "art," or "craft," is used, I find myself applying that same yardstick. What do I mean by "universal"? That's a good question for another time.
L'ama
This sort of thing makes for great discussion, a bit philosophical. I'm a photographer - I do commercial work and then I produce what I call my "fine art" photography, perhaps that reference is more to differentiate it from the commercial work. When I see the words "art" or "craft" I usually go past the terminology and check out the piece itself. I'm more interested in how well it is made, the attention to detail and care in production and its "message" - is he "artist" or "craftsperson" communicating well? What statement is being made?
In my world of photography we refer to "craft" as the actual production part of the process... how well made is the print?... high or low contrast, too dark or too light, gray tones or color values, dust specks all over it? In this case the use of the word "craft" is within a specific context.
For a long time there was a highbrow attitude that photography was not considered an art... it was definitely craft... and I still run into that attitude at times. In the New York public school system, photography (and I believe drafting as well) can be taught in both (or either) the art department or the technology department. Depending on which department under which the course was being taught, there would probably be a different approach to the art/craft of photography. I think of my gallery work as fine art - is my commercial work craft?... good question. I would certainly consider what Donna Foley and Mary Lou Reid make as fine art. A couple of years ago I did an art show in New Jersey. There was a fellow set up next to me that made and sold birdhouses. They were beautifully made, well constructed, looked great - some had a great sense of humor and others were very cool and funky. Although this fellow had gotten into this particular art show (it was a juried show), I would have a hard time thinking of the birdhouses as "fine art". So, what about architecture? Some buildings are truly unique in character and quality. I think of architecture as an art form - are architects artists?... are bird house architects artists?
Mark
Is architecture art?
I would think so.
Is it "fine" art? -hmmm... Why not?
Can the word "craft" be isolated as a technical term, as Mark uses it, to describe the mechanical proficiency of the creator? That would make sense...
Readers - More thoughts?
Post a Comment
<< Home